The Obama
justice department just announced it would not bring criminal charges against
anyone at Goldman Sachs. After an
exhaustive (their word) investigation, no one at the Justice(?) Department
could come up with a single law which Goldman violated. This continues a pattern of failing to
convict even one of the architects of a global robbery which almost destroyed
the world's economic framework.
After the repeal of the Glass-Steagle Act, commercial and investment
banks became one and they were free to gamble with depositor's money knowing
they were backed by a federal guarantee not to let them fail. Starting in 2000, these casinos began
creating and selling derivatives, collateralized debt, swaps and other vehicles
most of which these geniuses had no idea how to value or evaluate their
risk. (They used algorithms
devised by M.I.T. graduates who totally failed to adequately assess or predict
risk) The greedier they grew, the
more exotic the offerings.
Eventually, they began to offer packages of sub-prime mortgages bundled
together, which they knew would fail miserably, and sold them while at the same
time betting against them and making billions. They were no different than Madoff or Sanford. They were creating and selling fraud
and profiting from it.
Goldman Sachs created a package of securities christened
"Abacus". They allowed a
privileged customer and trader, John Paulsen, to pick which blighted properties
would go into this toxic soup.
Then Paulsen, and Sachs, took positions betting against their own
product. They made sure it would
sink and made money off the suckers they induced to invest. This practice, and many others like it,
robbed, de-frauded, cheated investors out of billions of dollars and exposed
the banks to such extreme jeopardy, the American taxpayer had to bail them out
to the tune of trillions of dollars.
Yet, the Justice Department could not find any crime they committed.
Goldman paid hundreds of millions of dollars in a civil settlement,
without having to admit any wrongdoing, as have numerous other banks. This continues a pattern of the very
rich and powerful buying their way out of jail. Angelo Mazzillo, the CEO of Countrywide Savings and Loan,
was one of the worst offenders on sub-prime mortgages. He paid a $70 million fine, about
1/10th of his net worth, and no criminal charges were pursued. It is clear there is a different set of
criminal statutes for the rich than for average Americans.
More recently, Barclays Bank paid over $400 million in fines for
manipulating the LIBOR lending rate which affects trillions of dollars of loans
each day. Sixteen other banks also
engaged in this manipulation and are under investigation. (Can you say conspiracy?) New York bank regulators announced the
British bank Standard Chartered PLC would pay $340 million to settle
allegations they were laundering money for Iran in violation of American
law. Another American bank stands
accused of laundering perhaps billions of drug cartel dollars. Again, no criminal charges for anyone
involved.
If the Justice Department is telling the truth...if they really can't
find a criminal statute to use against these thieves and bunko artists, then
Congress should do what it always does in cases like this...pass new more
restrictive criminal laws. When
the F.B.I. had trouble busting mobsters, Congress passed the R.I.C.O. Act. This law is credited with breaking the
mob's hold in this country. In the
drug wars, conspiracy laws are the prime weapons the feds use to convict. They don't have to find you with
drugs. Even without evidence, a
photograph, wiretap or actual drugs on your person, they can still get a
conviction if someone else is willing to testify to dealing with you thus
creating a conspiracy. Easily half
the federal drug convictions involve defendants accused of a conspiracy and in
many cases there is no physical evidence of drug use or possession at any time (scary if you think about it).
The government invented new criminal statutes to get the people they
wanted to get. I've told you about
sole liability laws, thousands of them, where you don't even have to know you
broke the law and yet can still be convicted. The government, and Congress, pride themselves on being
tough on crime, but it appears they are only tough in poor and urban areas and
with people who don't have much power and clout. Every year they pass more laws to lock up more folks, yet
not a single official of any bank, brokerage, insurance company or securities
firm has even been charged with a criminal offense, because the Justice
Department can't find anything to charge them with.
I wish my pen, or my vocabulary, were capable of writing or
communicating the derision and contempt I have for this turn of events. These institutions, and their
executives, engaged in massive fraud, theft, destruction of wealth and
endangered national security and they walk away scot free from it? Not only do they skate, but you had to
pay for their thieving ways. If
even you need proof the 1% operate in a different world, with different
standards, different consequences and different results than you or I, this is
proof.
The definition of a fascist state is one in which everything is illegal
and the government decides what to prosecute and what to let go. The definition of a
fascist/oligarch-state is one in which everything is illegal for most, but a
small privileged class of people.
Our republic is in serious danger of collapsing from internal rot as we
see our tax code, (returns Gov. Romney?) banking laws, drug laws etc written in
such as to exempt the 1% from any reckoning. Given the state of our civil liberties, it means no American
is safe from those with the most money and power.
No comments:
Post a Comment