At every
national convention, each party passes a platform document laying out their top
policy priorities and expressing the true nature of what the party stands for
philosophically. The Republicans
passed their platform telling all Americans what they will do with any power
they are able to obtain in November.
Despite Mitt Romney's attempts to distance himself from the comments
about "legitimate" rape by Congressman Todd Akin, the reality is both
Romney and his party march in lockstep with the Missouri senate candidate. The platform endorses a "human
life amendment" which calls for a total prohibition on abortion with no
exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the mother. The committee also agreed to language,
which would outlaw any contraceptive which acts after conception. This would eliminate Plan B morning
after pills.
Both Romney and Ryan, who goes further and would outlaw all forms of
contraception if his personhood amendment were passed, claim to be in favor of
smaller government and a less intrusive government, yet they cede to the feds
the right to tell a woman what she can do with her body and they impose the
government between a woman and her doctor. (What is the difference between a Chinese government which can
force a woman to have an abortion and the Republican government which can force
her "not" to have an abortion?)
The platform "salutes" so-called "informed consent"
laws. Because women cannot be
trusted to be informed...because women are emotional wrecks and don't make
rational decisions...because pregnant women have no idea what an abortion does
and take a cavalier approach to the procedure, the Republican platform supports
the contention government needs to force them to wait and have an ultrasound
and have the doctor explain what they are about to do. This salute comes on the heels of a law
in Virginia, proposed by the governor...McDonald...who leads the platform
committee, which would require an ultrasound stick to be inserted in a woman's
vagina. I guess that would be an
example of "legitimate" rape.
Continuing the theme of a small, unobtrusive government, the platform
calls on the government to decide who can get married and who can't. Not only does the Republican platform
denounce same sex marriage, it also opposes even civil unions calling them
"counterfeit marriages".
Romney's party calls for more laws like the ones passed in Arizona and
Alabama giving the government the right to stop you and demand your papers
proving you are an American citizen. They also call for the creation of a "national"
database (maintained by the government) which would contain data about all
Americans so employers can check to see if an applicant is in the country legally. (Gee, you think they might do other
things with this information too?)
The same party which supports state and local rights without
interference from Washington, would prohibit cities from voting to become
sanctuary cities refusing to cooperate with the federal immigration
service. The Tea Party's avatar
wants to force cities to knuckle under to the federal government. (They also oppose any state which voted
to legalize medicinal marijuana and Oregon's assisted suicide law) Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
As the Republicans pay lip service to championing the individual, the
platform calls for an end to women in combat and a reinstatement of the
prohibition on gays serving in the military. The platform opposes statehood for Washington D.C.
(apparently approving of taxation without representation...wasn't that the original
reason for the first Tea Party?) and want Congress to force the D.C. city
council to expand gun rights in the district.
The same Republican party which refused to raise taxes to pay for the
wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, ballooning the national debt and deficit by
borrowing the money from China instead, now wants a plank in the platform which
calls for a super majority in order to approve any tax increases. (We know how well this worked in
California...voters passed an initiative to eliminate a similar law and got the
first on-time budget in over 20 years)
This again is designed to let a minority thwart the will of the majority,
which runs contrary to everything they say they stand for in their party.
It is impossible to read the Republican platform without seeing all the
ways they contradict themselves and how they say one thing and do another. They spout small government rhetoric,
but in reality it is a party this wishes to use the government to intrude in
your house, public library, computer, vagina, personal health care decisions,
privacy and to tell you what is legal for you to conscientiously believe in.
This is not a conservative document. Conservatives preserve the best aspects of a nation and its
culture. This is a classic
regressive manifesto designed to turn back the clock...roll back social
progress...undo most of the good done in the 20th century and walk us back
towards the Gilded Age of vast wealth, no income tax, awful poverty, no middle
class, a castrated central government unable, or unwilling, to protect the most
vulnerable and neediest of its citizens.
For women the message could not be clearer. By virtue of your gender we will tell you what you can or
cannot do regarding your reproductive desires and outcomes. We will deny you access to
contraception. We abolish your
civil liberties once you are pregnant.
We will not fight for equal pay for equal work...affordable day
care...comprehensive pre-natal care, nor will we fight for a safe environment
which you can live and work within.
Romney and Ryan are one on this platform, so when you talk about who the
next president should be, imagine this platform implemented in full and imagine
who the winners and losers would be.
My guess is the breakdown would come out 1% vs. 99%. Do you disagree?
nice analysis, Bernie!
ReplyDelete